|
Hi Reader, Welcome to the 13th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). I write about transforming ICs into Impact Contributors. And today, we're talking about what happens when you replace judgment with curiosity. Let's get into it. 3 Things for Work (in L&D)1. Don't Deprioritize Curiosity-Driven Research (Nature)
2. How Do Workers Develop Good Judgment in the AI Era? (HBR)
3. AI and Cultural Debt (Deloitte 2026 Human Capital Trends)
2 Things for Life1. Reality Has a Surprising Amount of Detail
2. Alan Watts on Happiness and How to Live with Presence
1 Idea from MeJudgment is the default. Curiosity is the skill.My son turns six today. Every few weeks I catch myself thinking how cool it'll be when he's a bit older. When we can read real books together. Have real conversations. Then I catch myself missing the version of him that existed six months ago. I've spent four years trying to get better at this. Noticing when I'm evaluating or judging the present moment instead of being in it. In other words, when I'm somewhere other than right here. It shows up everywhere. Not just parenting.Think about the last meeting you were in. Someone shares an idea. Before they finish, half the room is already building a rebuttal. Not listening to understand. Listening to judge. Is this good or bad? Do I agree or disagree? That's the default setting. Judgment. Jonathan Haidt's research says it plainly: we don't reason to find the truth. We reason to find the best argument for what we already believe. Being confident enough to stay unsureThe alternative is harder than it sounds. It means walking into a room, assuming you don't have the full picture, and listening to understand. Being, as George Saunders put it, "confident enough to stay unsure." And there's a real payoff. Angus Fletcher, drawing on decades of decision-making research, found that the longer we suspend our judgment, the more accurate our subsequent verdicts become. Not only because we gather more data, but because we stop filtering it. Judgment closes doors. Curiosity opens them.The return on curiosity compounds in every conversation where you feel the pull to be right instead of to learn. Wishing my son were older or missing him younger are both ways of judging the idea of him instead of being curious about his reality. Last week he was riding his bike while the sun stayed out past seven for the first time since October. He stopped, looked up, and said: "Daddy, I think it's almost time to go camping again." I love camping, so it lit me up that he was excited about it too. And I only caught it because I wasn't somewhere else, judging the moment. If you want to learn how to do this conversation, I wrote about the three techniques that make this practical here. That's it for this week. Enjoy your Sunday! We have a birthday party to host at a local arcade. I'll be back in two weeks ✌️ Andrew P.S. 👉 If curiosity over judgment resonates, hit reply. I'm building something around this idea and would love to hear where it shows up in your work. |
ICs can do more on their own with AI than ever before. This is both a challenge and an opportunity for L&D. This newsletter explores how to equip ICs with the influence skills that drive retention, accelerate OKRs, and position L&D as a strategic partner to the business. (Sent twice a month).
Hey Reader, Welcome to the 20th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). This one is about the highest bar a piece of learning can clear, and it has nothing to do with the score it gets. Let's get into it. 3 Things for Work (in L&D) Learning By Teaching (Curious Lion) The Feynman path to mastery: you don't really understand something until you can teach it. Where "each one, teach one" started for us, four years before two reps proved it on the job. 🏋 Effort ≈ 4 min read...
Hey Reader, Welcome to the 19th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). One post on LinkedIn last week would not stop moving. It was about AI making your people more productive and more likely to quit. Ninety thousand people saw it, and the comments improved my thinking on it. The version they argued me into is the one idea below. Let's get into it. 3 Things for Work (in L&D) In the workforce, AI is having the opposite effect it was supposed to, UC Berkeley researchers warn...
Hey Reader, Welcome to the 18th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). I write about transforming ICs into Impact Contributors. (By the way, did you see Elena Verna's viral piece on High-Impact ICs? So cool to see what we've been talking about here for years validated by strong external signals.) A personal one this week. I've supported Arsenal for 30 years, and 22 of them were trauma. We won the league in 2004 with a team that didn't lose a single game, then did not win it...