|
Hi Reader, Welcome to the 12th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). I write about transforming ICs into Impact Contributors. And today, we're talking about why management skills are no longer optional for anyone. Let's get into it. 3 Things for Work (in L&D)1. To Thrive in the AI Era, Companies Need Agent Managers (HBR)
2. Human Capabilities Are at the Heart of High-Performing Teams (Deloitte)
3. Management as AI Superpower (Ethan Mollick)
2 Things for Life1. This Alan Watts Lecture About Destiny Will Give You Goosebumps
2. 35 Health Tips From Experts That Will Help You Live Better (NYT)
1 Idea from MeYour ICs are already managers. They just don't know it yet. Every time someone on your team delegates work to an AI agent, they're doing management. Framing the problem. Setting context. Defining what "done" looks like. Checking the output. Pushing back when it misses the mark. That's delegation. Feedback. Quality control. The same capabilities we've been teaching managers for decades. I sat down recently and mapped five core management skills against AI interactions:
Same skills. Different medium. TalentLMS found that 56% of L&D leaders are leaning into human skills while 44% prioritize AI fluency. But that split is artificial. Problem framing is problem framing, whether you're directing a person or an agent. I shared this mapping with an L&D leader at a 3,000-person company. She'd been independently researching management skills in an agentic world. When I said "ICs are becoming managers," she stopped. "I hadn't thought about it like that." She owned both IC and manager development. She'd just never connected them. This is the part that should make L&D leaders pay attention. Right now, most companies fund two separate programs: one labeled "AI readiness" and one labeled "leadership capability." Two vendors. Two budgets. Two sets of workshops teaching the same underlying skill. The companies that figure this out first won't just develop better people. They'll do it at half the cost. So here's the question worth sitting with: Is your 2026 development budget funding one capability model, or two? That's it for this week. Enjoy your Sunday! I'll be back in two weeks ✌️ Andrew P.S. 👉 If you're rethinking how IC development and AI readiness connect, hit reply. I'm working on a framework for this and would love to compare notes. |
ICs can do more on their own with AI than ever before. This is both a challenge and an opportunity for L&D. This newsletter explores how to equip ICs with the influence skills that drive retention, accelerate OKRs, and position L&D as a strategic partner to the business. (Sent twice a month).
Hey Reader, Welcome to the 20th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). This one is about the highest bar a piece of learning can clear, and it has nothing to do with the score it gets. Let's get into it. 3 Things for Work (in L&D) Learning By Teaching (Curious Lion) The Feynman path to mastery: you don't really understand something until you can teach it. Where "each one, teach one" started for us, four years before two reps proved it on the job. 🏋 Effort ≈ 4 min read...
Hey Reader, Welcome to the 19th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). One post on LinkedIn last week would not stop moving. It was about AI making your people more productive and more likely to quit. Ninety thousand people saw it, and the comments improved my thinking on it. The version they argued me into is the one idea below. Let's get into it. 3 Things for Work (in L&D) In the workforce, AI is having the opposite effect it was supposed to, UC Berkeley researchers warn...
Hey Reader, Welcome to the 18th edition of the 3-2-1 (check out previous issues here). I write about transforming ICs into Impact Contributors. (By the way, did you see Elena Verna's viral piece on High-Impact ICs? So cool to see what we've been talking about here for years validated by strong external signals.) A personal one this week. I've supported Arsenal for 30 years, and 22 of them were trauma. We won the league in 2004 with a team that didn't lose a single game, then did not win it...